I am catching up with posting online my articles.
Well... if we try to answer this question we may enter into the judgment which will be certainly based on our personal values, definitions and opinions. And thus the answer to this question will vary from person to person.
Thus there is no point in stating whether the politician is good or not good or bad person. Personally I would prefer that we do the assessment of what the politician does while being in the position of power and especially if s/he follows the principle of what is best for all. But within that there is no intention to judge her/him as good or bad person but only to decide whether this person should continue being in position of power.
But this is still to come in the future.
As of today most of the politicians do everything possible to present themselves as a good person and perfect citizen because the more people believe and see her/him as a good person then s/he has a greater chance of being elected. And once they are being elected they are doing "what they want", which means that most of the electoral promises are forgotten and in reality the politicians are occupied to take care of the interests of their sponsors ( corporations ).
Can we blame for this the politicians ?
Well... it is obvious that the politicians present themselves as good persons because this is what the voters expect. And if the voters would stop looking at the perfect image, which is cleverly presented and "manufactured" by the marketing teams and the media and instead the voters would start making their decision based on what the political candidate presents as a human being living the principle of what is best for all, then we would have completely different world. But this is not going to happen unless people start to educate themselves, use logic and ask questions instead of accepting unconditionally the brainwashing of the media.